Archive for the ‘Foundations’ category

Hard Pressed with Extra Starch

October 14th, 2008

I grew up hearing stories of my dad’s college days.  One such story included an acquaintance that owned a pair of pants that he did not wash until they were told to have disentigrated.  The pants at one point in time could stand up in a corner on their own from all of the materials that had been collected in the fibers of the fabric.  My personal hygiene alarm goes off every time that story comes to mind.  My skin crawls with the imaginary microbes, bacteria and germs that those pants must have harbored.  The pants were not standing up because they were filled with something, namely legs, but instead they were standing up because of external influences.

I had a realization this week as I was pondering the significance of the numbers of trillions of dollars that have been lost globally in various financial markets.  The realization was not one that I should have had to wait until 31 to have and I wanted to pass it along in case others had not been exposed to it: The stocks in the market may very well need a good washing because there are not always legs holding up their pants.  Each stock is not worth the value that is given to it on the market that day, it is worth the value the people (thankfully not germs) put on it and built into the fibers of the stock the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, or years before.  But unless the companies behind the stocks are actually doing amazingly good things and you’re owning a piece of a real company that is worthy of ownership, you could be buying extra crunchy pants.

You could be hard pressed to find a company that is worth the esteemed value of the stock, but it is important to remember that not each person who owns a $132/share stock paid $132 per share.  They might have paid $32.00/share and others after them paid more than that.  Obviously that’s why the investor makes money if they buy at $32.00 and sell at $132.00, but when the market tumbles and share values drop its not a loss of actual wealth, its the loss of unrealized wealth.  There’s a BIG difference.  Its not that the estimated value doesn’t matter, but instead it is important to have the principles of the theory behind the market in mind as you’re looking at the numbers.  If I buy a stock at $32.00 and sell it at $30.00 I very literally lose $2.00 per share (plus any trading fees to buy the stock and to sell the stock).  What you need to realize is that as an investor I may have also missed the unrealized reward of the stock jumping to $64.00 per share and in an attempt to ‘hold out for more’ the stock reversed and dropped me down to where I realized the stock was going to go down to less than I paid for it and by the time I could find a buyer, it had devalued to less than my original buying price.  Realized and unrealized wealth are two different things and when the media or overly dramatic persons speak about trillions of dollars in wealth disappearing, it isn’t all like real dollars going up into real smoke (we’ll ignore the carbon footprint of that smoke & money fire), it is some real smoke and some real fire shot from an impressive camera angle that makes the pants look taller than they are.  They’re standing in the corner, looking tall and legless, but they’re still pants, and they still need to be estimated at a reasonable value that reflects the worth of the company – much like pants that really, really should have been washed so that I never, ever had to hear stories of my dad’s friend’s pants that probably smelled foul.

Ewwwwww.

Cholestrol, Fat and the Economy

October 10th, 2008

Did you know that your body needs Cholestrol and fat? I bet that all of the negative ‘news’ you hear doesn’t lead you to believe that you do, but you do.  In fact some fats will keep your brain healthy, and some cholestrol actually helps your heart.  Crazy, huh? [disclosure: this is not medical advice - seek a doctor and all that jazz].  Here’s the kicker: some debt in the economy, as a tool to help companies get started seems to be OK.  Some debt for consumers seems to be helpful at times when major things need some attention.  I don’t recommend debt, but small levels in specific locations are safer than others.  The safe types of fat and cholestrol in appropriate quantities keep your body moving and grooving.

Here’s the deal: too much of the debt doesn’t keep things moving, it makes things stop up and causes strokes just like regular human body blockage.  Adding more debt to the economy’s ‘breathing room’ by ‘unfreezing’ the credit opportunities is just like putting a stint into an artery but them immediately going out to guzzle down the largest fast food meal you can find.

Trent of the Simple Dollar posted on twitter that he had a person asking how they should tell their children that they’re losing their home.  More credit doesn’t help this situation.  If I lose my home due to foreclosure having access to more credit doesn’t fix the problem that I’m in over my head.  The ability to infinitely borrow doesn’t help anyone.  The ability to aggressively pay back the debt and get to a positive cash flow matters a lot.

If I cheat and have a nasty, super-duper grody dripping rack of ribs all by myself but then go run a mile and then eat another sloppy rack of ribs (which is wrong, because ribs do not have to be prepared like that) I’ve not fixed the problem either.  If I got into debt, pay back most of it and then buy a bigger TV on it, but am not saving for retirement I’ve blown it.  If I go into retirement with money saved, but still have stupid amounts of debt, I’ve blown it.  Debt, much like a medical condition that needs attention, can’t be put off indefinitely.

So, watch your diet, watch your spending, take care of any debt or health issues, and don’t be fooled into thinking that we can quickly fix the economic situation with more debt.  More debt doesn’t help like more cholestrol doesn’t help.  Which is why I’m going to stop typing and go eat a carrot.  The Vitamin A will help my eyes so that I can read more of the stuff coming in over the wire on this screen;)

The Crash of ‘29 Compared to Our Current Crisis

October 6th, 2008

After reading Wikipedia’s entry on the causes of the Great Depression I was to say the least: interested in churning through the philosophical differences between varying views.  I’d love to write whole essays on the subjects, but for now I’ll delve into the first bits and then if interest shows up I’ll write more.  Here’s the first quote from Wikipedia that grabbed me:

Those who believe in a large role for governments in the economy believe it was mostly a failure of the free markets and those who believe in free markets believe it was mostly a failure of government that compounded the problem.

This is a false dichotomy.  There is a need for us to recognize the two conceptual entities, but they operate like conjoined twins with the same heart: the people that make them up.  In the United States that is the voters and the consumers, who are not one-and-the-same, but very nearly one-and-the-same.  We elect leaders and while we don’t vote on every issue ourselves, we have an impact as a corporate group.  And as consumers we impact the buying and selling trends.  Peter of Bible Money Matters tweeted earlier today, “Does it seem like a major component of the current financial crisis is fear? Maybe things wouldn’t be so bad if everyone didn’t panic.”  The problem is that emotion controls the market to a certain degree.  I’ve written before that emotions cost me a huge amount of money.  Huge.  All because of emotions.  But I am not about to make the false assessment that the consumer and the government are only related superficially and really operate separately.  Its a simple assertion that shifts blame, but the reality is that we’re in this together.

In the Wikipedia section that talks about Debt it is interesting to see how they assert that over-bearing debt leads to a downward spiral of financial catastrophe.  There has been a common mindset in the last several decades that debt lubricates the system and keeps the machine of industry going.  While I will agree that it can help facilitate in some situations, it doesn’t keep the industry going indefinitely and debt that is unchecked clearly leads to collapse or major, major turmoil.  This is true in the American household and also proves out in business and government.  Germany after World War I was so financially beaten down by war debts that their money was hyper-inflated.  The debt killed their economy.  Our current United States dollar is flailing in the water due to its being produced ‘cheaply’ and flooding the market.  Our debt is costing us.

Money Supply is next on the list at Wikipedia.  Interestingly enough the philosophy held by at least some is that the central bank controls the supply of money and that during the great depression the supply of money available on the market was trickled down to a fraction of what was available earlier in the decade.  The problem is that inflation is happening by ‘over-supplying’ the money.  So if over-supply stops the economy from slowing down, but causes inflation, which causes other economic issue you still have to answer the question of why supply of money being more liberal (by which I mean more readily available and am not talking about politics) is overall a better thing?  I imagine that like many things this comes down to moderation.  If the Federal Reserve had loosened things up back in the 30’s it might have been beneficial, but not as loose as they are now, in which case we’ve seen an extreme pendulum swing.

My Own Personal Philosophy

I had a boss at a Christian Book Store in College who made a statement that has set in my mind as an axiom of truth: Good businessmen pay their employees wages that respect the needs of the employee.  This is to say that if the employee needs $1,000.00 a month to live and provide for his family, then that’s what the business person pays the employee.  The business person knows that its better to take moral comfort in knowing that you provided for your employees, and the employees know it, than to drive an insanely expensive vehicle, to live in a mansion, or to die rich, but still be dead.  This is not anti-capitalist.  It is not anti-wealth, it is just encouraging fiscal responsibility.

Furthermore, employees should be willing to work dilligently to make the business profitable or more profitable and not just do the least amount of work possible.  This respects the business person’s leadership and provision.  I work as a contractor for a group of four men who own and operate a company with roughly 50 employees and contractors.  Their respect and care for employees is stunning.  Part of why I have chosen to continue my relationship with them for more than 8 years is because they take care of me.  I work hard to take care of them as well.  They have earned my respect and so I work hard to make sure that their needs are met or exceeded where possible.

The crash of 1929 and the following great depression have some similarities.  Government doesn’t deserve all of the blame, neither do the masses of consumers, or the big businesses.  Instead we all own this responsibility.  We all fail, or we all succeed together.  If this is a recession, a depression or any other financial scenario it is something that we work through as a global community, a nation, a state, a county, a city and a neighborhood.  We work on it together and we grow – that’s something that we need no matter the time.

Picked Last

August 12th, 2008

I suck at money management.  If there was something I was not good at, it is actually managing my money.  I am a sucker for instant gratification.  Here’s a quote from a friend of mine that has nothing to do with personal finance on the surface, but has everything to do with it in principle.  I asked her about what her tryouts involved for a High School Volleyball team:

“Um, 3 hours of watching girls that think they can play… girls that really can play and girls that have no skill but are there because someone said that they were good once.  And then at the end of the week: cutting them.”

I would be the player that thinks he can play.  I am not the player that knows he can play, I am not the player that anyone ever told that I could play.  I would be the self-decieved player.

But the good thing about the self-decieved player is that the player has intentions.  Good intentions.  Intentions that are tied to potential.  Not in a ‘motivational poster that is so unreal that nobody would buy it’ sort of way, but with the passion that may some day turn into an acceptable utility player that isn’t the team captain, or the super-star, but is the person who keeps the team going with drive and is one of the many.

I’m the guy who is picked last.  But I’m working on being the guy you’d pick 5th.  I’m OK with fifth because at least its a step up.  I’m OK with being picked last as long as I’m picked.  Right field is awesome, catcher is awesome.  I don’t need to be the star, I don’t need to be the slugger, I just need to get on base.  Our finances have slipped some recently and I’m the guy responsible for that.

We’re not staying here.  We’re going to kick this into high gear.  We’re going to kill our darlings.  We’re going to plug the leaks and batton down the hatches.  We’re going to mix our metaphors until the cows come home.  But we’re not going to stay last.  We’re going to stay home – instead of eating out.

How To Get a Job as a Software Developer

July 28th, 2008

A client I work for is looking to fill a position.  They’re looking for someone who has certain qualifications as you might expect that just hiring anyone who has used Microsoft Office might result in a bad piece of software.  The responses that have come in have consistently been bad or worse.  For example, one person actually gave an answer to a question that was very short, but the second sentence was “Use a search engine.”  The answer should not be use a search engine unless the question is, “What are you doing if you ask Jeeves?”  And in that case, its still grammatically incorrect.

Furthermore, if you’re filling out a series of questions, please don’t make a fool out of yourself by using the search engines.  Well, you can use the search engines, but I wouldn’t recommend simply copying and pasting the answers into the response.  There is very little that impresses me more than a good, efficient worker, but copy and paste from Google, Wikipedia, or any other source and blatantly plagerising the answers and passing them off as your own is completely unethical, lazy and useless.  A company that discovers you’re a liar, even if they’ve hired you on, will can your sorry bum rather quickly.

If you want a job as a software developer you’ll want to actually know your stuff.  Actually know the languages you’re reporting you know, actually list projects you actually worked on and helped complete (I can’t believe the number of folks who fake resume work).  If you want a job as a software developer, study up by learning about the company you’re trying to get hired on at.  Find out what software you’ll be working on, if at all possible, and focus in on knowing what you’re getting yourself into.  Don’t get surprised in the interview if you thought you were working on one project and the company discusses a different product, but at least be aware of the projects.  Be knowledgable.

Be prepared to ask questions and interview the company employees as well.  Be prepared to find out what sort of time restrictions exist at the company, find out what their development process is.  Ask what tools they use.  Make sure you know what they’re using and you’re comfortable with it.

In the end you need to be a worthy candidate, put forth the effort to be that candidate.  Make sure you’ve got your ducks in a row and that you’re prepared to take the position on with passion.  Lastly, make sure you’re a person who asks why a project, task or code change is done because it will help you excede the requirements, and knock out the interviewer (figuratively, of course).  And don’t use the search engines to knock them out ;)

This is What I Want Now. This is What I Want for Two Years.

July 7th, 2008

A Story of Contracts

Once upon a time there was a boy, we’ll call him me.  His name won’t be me, but I’m going to share a little about myself.  And actually, I wasn’t a little boy.  I was a grown man.  Well, I guess I still am.  But this story is about the idiocy of temporary pleasure verses the wisdom of thinking a little longer term, or very long term.  I had wanted to save money by spening less on the luxury of non-broadcast television and switched from Cable Television (with Comcastic service) to Satelite service DirectV from the stars… or some such nonsense.  I would save money and get the better programming of directive DirecTV.

Except that I had to agree to a two year contract to pay DetecTV monthly during that two years or else pay a penalty fee to infecTV for each month remaining in the contact.  Being a cheerful dolt, and not ever thinking that I would ever not want to get derelicTV, I agreed to that lovely penalty.  The world was grand and there were weeks of Food Network to watch with the added benefit of children’s cartoons, educational television, and news broadcasts twenty-four hours a day slevin days a week.  The fun and entertainment we would have due to DefecTV was endless.  Until we actually wanted to end the service.

Fast-forward a year and a half and I still have half a year left of paying more a month than I need to because we’re in a bundled package from our phone/internet/smellovision provider.  Locked in for two years of promised payment even though better deals could be had (and I would actually dump my land-line phone as well, thus futher reducing my monthly outgo towards communications and entertainment).  So the young boy who was me, who I am now -  as an adult, made a dumb choice because what he wanted then was what he was obviously going to want for two years.

The moral of this story, other than avoid the shoddy equipment that comes with the ‘awesome’ package at insecTV, is that you shouldn’t commit to a contract unless you’re really, really, really, really sure that its what you need, its what you want, and that you’re going to want it in two years with just as much passion or excitement.  There are a lot of companies that masquerade as your friend until they lock you into a contract and then you discover that you’re really bound, like so many periodicals, to servitude, slavery, and to eat pudding with cement mixed into it.  And after watching enough episodes of House on satellite television, I’m confidently going to announce that I’d no longer like to eat cement, I’ve seen what it can do to your intestines, and I don’t want to undergo that kind of surgery to get it out of me.

What do you want now?  What do you think you will still want in two years that you want now?

The Paradigm Shift: Credit Cards Are Not the Problem

June 7th, 2008

As I had mentioned in an earlier post I’ve had a paradigm shift in how I look at credit cards.  My past attitude is that credit cards were evil without much in the way of exception.  I don’t have the same strong opinion any more.  Before I’m struck down with hate email or comments with great intensity let me clarify that most people who don’t like credit cards, when provoked to a good, long think, will agree with me.  The credit cards that get abused are a symptom!  Just like money isn’t evil by itself, credit cards are not evil by themselves.  If you pay off your credit card each and every month and maximize your return on the credit card’s reward program then the credit card is not a problem for you.

The symptom of debt is actually a symptom of the root problem: lack of self control.  If you understand where your finances are and you maximize your use of the card within the constraints of your budget, you might be able to pay for your family’s vacation in rewards.  James, a long time reader of my blogging (I don’t recall how James found me, but I’ve been grateful for the things I’ve learned from him and his commenting), actually left a comment stating that’s what he does some time ago.

My dad, a financially astute guy, uses his Discover card for as many expenses as he can and maximizes his rewards this way.  I have to admit to thinking this was crack smoking crazy until I realized that I was putting the blame on the wrong thing.  I’m not recommending everyone get as many credit cards as they can or that folks use credit cards if they can’t control themselves when they have access to the credit cards, but I am saying that I recognize that my previous stance was legalism.  As Romans 14:23b states: “…whatever is not from faith is sin.”  Don’t spend a dime that is not spent in reliance on the Lord.  This could be spent virtually with a credit card or literally with cash, but if you’re doing it out of compulsion and not in the abiding life of Christ, then its not the right attitude or way to be spending money in the first place!

This isn’t just a paradigm shift, this is a right-aligning with what the word of God teaches about walking by faith.  If I make a law about credit cards then I have failed to see the fullness of my relationship with Christ in the area I have created the law in.  I died to the law and the nature of the law when I was identified in Christ’s death, burial and resurrection.  I’m going to pay off my credit cards, cancel all but one, and then as I abide in Christ, I’ll focus on my heavenly relationship, knowing those earn eternal rewards, and use the Discover to maximize the earthly rewards which might just be used to help those in need (Romans 12:13).

A Letter From Abraham Lincoln to Mr. Johnston

March 25th, 2008

Dave Ramsey mentioned this later on a recent podcast episode (which could have been a repeat) and so I looked it up.  It can be found online in a collection of his writings here.  However, I thought you might like to read the letter because it is quite interesting to see Abe’s approach to helping his family.

Dear Johnston, Your request for eighty dollars I do not think it best to
comply with now. At the various times when I have helped you a little
you have said to me, “We can get along very well now”; but in a very
short time I find you in the same difficulty again. Now, this can only
happen by some defect in your conduct. What that defect is, I think I
know. You are not lazy, and still you are an idler. I doubt whether,
since I saw you, you have done a good whole day’s work in any one day.
You do not very much dislike to work, and still you do not work much,
merely because it does not seem to you that you could get much for it.
This habit of uselessly wasting time is the whole difficulty; it is
vastly important to you, and still more so to your children, that you
should break the habit. It is more important to them, because they have
longer to live, and can keep out of an idle habit before they are in it,
easier than they can get out after they are in.

You are now in need of some money; and what I propose is, that you shall
go to work, “tooth and nail,” for somebody who will give you money for
it. Let father and your boys take charge of your things at home,
prepare for a crop, and make the crop, and you go to work for the best
money wages, or in discharge of any debt you owe, that you can get; and,
to secure you a fair reward for your labour, I now promise you, that for
every dollar you will, between this and the first of May, get for your
own labour, either in money or as your own indebtedness, I will then
give you one other dollar. By this, if you hire yourself at ten dollars
a month, from me you will get ten more, making twenty dollars a month
for your work. In this I do not mean you shall go off to St. Louis, or
the lead mines, or the gold mines in California, but I mean for you to
go at it for the best wages you can get close to home in Coles County.
Now, if you will do this, you will be soon out of debt, and, what is
better, you will have a habit that will keep you from getting in debt
again. But, if I should now clear you out of debt, next year you would
be just as deep in as ever. You say you would almost give your place in
heaven for seventy or eighty dollars. Then you value your place in
heaven very cheap, for I am sure you can, with the offer I make, get the
seventy or eighty dollars for four or five months’ work. You say if I
will furnish you the money you will deed me the land, and, if you don’t
pay the money back, you will deliver possession. Nonsense! If you can’t
now live with the land, how will you then live without it? You have
always been kind to me, and I do not mean to be unkind to you. On the
contrary, if you will but follow my advice, you will find it worth more
than eighty times eighty dollars to you.

I guess we could call this a guest post by Abraham Lincoln :)

What is a Million Dollars Really Worth?

March 19th, 2008

I had someone hit this site looking for, “Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?”  I can’t believe that people would consider this, but then again, its people we’re talking about: the anonymous mass of Internet users who don’t have to be identified and so asking such a question doesn’t come with the stigma that asking it of your friends and classmates might.  The question that begs is this: What is a million dollars worth?

In our modern relativistic culture there is little value placed on sexuality within marriage, and the sanctity of marriage (sanctity being the setting aside as special) .  Sex is not worth a million dollars, that cheapens it, it is invaluable.  A million dollars is a lot of money, but it isn’t enough money to offset emotional scars, the fact that you’d be engaging in prostitution (see: Eliot Spitzer).

Various people have posed nude in magazines for money, taken jobs that they didn’t agree with because of a high paying salary, and of course there’s the age old televangelist schtick as well.  Money is not important if it is gained in an ill gotten fashion.  Having standards, focusing on the long term impact (how many women did something pornographic and then had children and were mortified that their children would find out?  What about parents finding out?).

A million dollars won’t buy you happiness, love, or a long term financial state (it is just as easily lost on frivolous activities and spending).  What’s a million dollars worth to you?  Is it worth your dignity?

Principles for Success

March 11th, 2008

If you want to be successful in life then there is one principle you must learn first: Learn principles. What makes a chef great? They know the principles of cooking and flavors and how they balance and then they can take unlikely ingredients and mesh them together into a signature dish. What makes an engineer great? They learn principles and then take those principles and apply them systematically to their work. What makes money managers great? They learn principles, apply them and keep their finances in order and grow their net worth.

Elementary school and primary school, and unfortunately some college classes tend to be about rote memorization. The best teachers I ever had were the ones who took the principles behind the things I was memorizing and taught me those instead of merely cramming data into my head. As a web developer/programmer I have memorized a lot of coding things, but I didn’t begin to think as a programmer until I learned the principles behind smart programming (sometimes called ‘patterns’). My finances were a mess even though I had heard good personal finance bits and pieces, but it wasn’t until I learned the principles behind sound personal finance (influenced by blogs like the Simple Dollar, NCN, and Dave Ramsey’s “The Total Money Makeover“).

Smart, successful people will be able to think with abstraction. They’ll be able to identify the principles that make up great process and then merge those principles, where they apply, to their different areas of expertise. Recently I read a book called, “Critical Chain” and it had lots of good principles in it. It is how I run my budget (which I posted a bit about before, but I’m going to write a further detailed article later), but it wasn’t how I ran my budget before reading it because I hadn’t clearly seen the principle. Once I learned it, I was able to see how it could apply to other areas in my life.

Learn principles, learn how they can be applied across broad scopes of your life, and then forget about rote memorization. It could save you thousands of dollars, millions of dollars, your life, or a few minutes time here and there, but get past the short term rules and start thinking bigger.