Zinger!

November 7th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

I was listening to the NCN podcast when NCN said something that was simple, and yet not stated so clearly before (to my recollection) in word or print:

“…not just living on less than you earn, but living on less than you earn minus what you need to save.”

For context, go listen to the podcast (and subscribe while you’re at it).

Why We Should (NOT) Tax the Wealthy More

October 27th, 2008 by Randy Peterman 1 comment »

What if your company where you worked were bought out by another company and in that acquisition you were offered $100,000.00 as a bonus for the acquisition?  Would you take it?  In the state of Colorado where I live taxes on that money, including federal taxes on that money would put you at having 40% taken in taxes (without itemized deductions and what not).  That would be like actually getting 60,000.00.  Would you still take it?  Oops, I forgot something.  The Federal Government actually takes a bonus 20% on top of that for them because the money is a lump sum.  That would leave you with $40,000.00 out of an original $100,000.00.  Would you still take it?

Sure, you’d still want the money, but I think that the recent hullabaloo that I’ve heard recently about taxing the wealthy (AKA ‘rich’) to distribute the wealth is not as forthright as it sounds.  There are two (or more) areas that concern me about this.  The first is that recent numbers show that just under 40% of the entire nation’s federal income tax is generated by the top 1% of America’s earners.  That’s right, the ration is that askew [see: http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/23440.html].   The second is that in my own household if I am strapped for cash: I have to either go into deeper debt (which I’m digging out of) or I have to cut spending.  I can only go so far deep into debt, so we cut spending.  If the Federal government wants to get their budget together, they too, should have to cut spending and not raise billions or trillions of dollars in debt.

Here’s the kicker: if you add on sales tax which there is the potential of the $40,000.00 being spent ‘in state’ you could see up to 10% MORE tax being taken at the register depending where you go shopping.  That means that out of the original $100,000.00 the person who was rewarded by their company has now had 70% taken in the form of taxes.  That would make me want to throw another tea party.

I know that as a country we’re all trying to see equitable charity, the furtherance of our families and the general well being of the population, but if we can’t afford wellfare programs because we don’t have enough money, if we can’t afford to pay for a massive military (which is a hot topic and I won’t attempt to address it in this post), if we can’t afford to watch our airports with a crack squad of TSA agents (who fail to find my pocket knife every time I forget I have it with me) then we need to cut things.  This hurts.  This could impact jobs, this could impact the entire nation.

Here’s an opportunity for Americans to be innovative again.  This nation had a time of prosperity that was unbelievable.  We had brilliant thinkers making brilliant products brilliantly.  But we’ve passed that and now we’re all hoping to be lucky enough to make it with the next e-business, dot com super-story, or sue someone else for their money.  But what if brilliant people worked together to make new brilliant products that we then sold to the rest of the world just like the ‘good old days’ only it was now?

Well, if that were to happen we’d tax the snot out of those brilliant people and punish them for their productivity.  I think I’d prefer to just shuffle along and make moderate wages and not be taxed up to 70%.  This isn’t Bill Gates’ problem.  This isn’t Warren Buffet’s problem.  This is your problem.  It’s my problem.  It’s our problem.  Lets vote next month (not too many days away, now) with a conscience.  Lets send a message to our representatives that we’re not going to take it any more.  We, as a people, have a right to the fruits of our labor and at present we’re not looking out for one another, and it makes me sad.  The good news is that there are ways out of where we’re at.  It will take determination, and it might hurt a bit, but if we can make a united effort, we might just be the United People of the United States.

A Pause That Refreshes

October 24th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

My buddy Trint over at ‘Surely You’re Not Serious’ is doing a chocolate drive.  The drive raises money to buy chocolate for troops in Iraq who are injured.  Apparently the only thing better than chocolate would be being home, but if they can’t be home, having chocolate makes their days.

Please consider dropping by and finding out how you can help.

Shadow Boxing and Taxes

October 23rd, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

Click on the following link to read what Trint wrote up on taxes and the historical background for the word silhouette. http://www.surelyyourenotserious.com/blog/?p=787

I love taxes and personal finance and history all worked into one post.  Keep it up, Trint!

Laptop Locks: Not This One!

October 20th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

If you have a laptop (and I happen to have one and a half) and you buy a lock for it, consider the model and design.  As the video here shows, some of them take almost nothing to get unlocked. The video shows a Kensington lock being opened with a small cardboard tube. Not a good use of your money, or preservation of your technological expenditure.


Laptops’ LockClick here for more home videos

$20.00 less for Gas

October 19th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

I just paid $20.00 less for a tank of gas than at the height of this year’s gas price gala.  Strangely the price of petroleum has not gone up to the astronomical numbers that were predicted before.  Numbers of multiple hundreds of dollars per barrel.  Instead the ‘invisible hand’ balanced the market out.  Prices went higher, consumers used less.  My family really needed to drive more since the school year started, and the more expensive gas got, the more we pinched pennies in other areas to try to offset the expense of gas.  The good thing is that we can rest for a week while prices are lowering – they’ll go back up soon enough, but at least that gives us a reprieve.

How much more or less do you drive depending on the cost of gas?

Dish Washer = Wish Dasher

October 18th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

Our dish washer is on the fritz.  Time to replace it so that it

1) Cleans the dishes

2) Stops leaking water onto the kitchen floor

The good thing is that we can do it.  The bad thing is that we have to.  Any strong recommendations would be greatly appreciated!

Icky

October 17th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

Not that you need to know, but the number of hits since the economy has ‘tightened’ has not fluctuated a lot.  The number of visitors from search engines with naughty phrases about making money having sex has gone up.  I think I’m losing relevance and my blog’s title is causing me SEO problems.

Icky.

Hard Pressed with Extra Starch

October 14th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

I grew up hearing stories of my dad’s college days.  One such story included an acquaintance that owned a pair of pants that he did not wash until they were told to have disentigrated.  The pants at one point in time could stand up in a corner on their own from all of the materials that had been collected in the fibers of the fabric.  My personal hygiene alarm goes off every time that story comes to mind.  My skin crawls with the imaginary microbes, bacteria and germs that those pants must have harbored.  The pants were not standing up because they were filled with something, namely legs, but instead they were standing up because of external influences.

I had a realization this week as I was pondering the significance of the numbers of trillions of dollars that have been lost globally in various financial markets.  The realization was not one that I should have had to wait until 31 to have and I wanted to pass it along in case others had not been exposed to it: The stocks in the market may very well need a good washing because there are not always legs holding up their pants.  Each stock is not worth the value that is given to it on the market that day, it is worth the value the people (thankfully not germs) put on it and built into the fibers of the stock the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, or years before.  But unless the companies behind the stocks are actually doing amazingly good things and you’re owning a piece of a real company that is worthy of ownership, you could be buying extra crunchy pants.

You could be hard pressed to find a company that is worth the esteemed value of the stock, but it is important to remember that not each person who owns a $132/share stock paid $132 per share.  They might have paid $32.00/share and others after them paid more than that.  Obviously that’s why the investor makes money if they buy at $32.00 and sell at $132.00, but when the market tumbles and share values drop its not a loss of actual wealth, its the loss of unrealized wealth.  There’s a BIG difference.  Its not that the estimated value doesn’t matter, but instead it is important to have the principles of the theory behind the market in mind as you’re looking at the numbers.  If I buy a stock at $32.00 and sell it at $30.00 I very literally lose $2.00 per share (plus any trading fees to buy the stock and to sell the stock).  What you need to realize is that as an investor I may have also missed the unrealized reward of the stock jumping to $64.00 per share and in an attempt to ‘hold out for more’ the stock reversed and dropped me down to where I realized the stock was going to go down to less than I paid for it and by the time I could find a buyer, it had devalued to less than my original buying price.  Realized and unrealized wealth are two different things and when the media or overly dramatic persons speak about trillions of dollars in wealth disappearing, it isn’t all like real dollars going up into real smoke (we’ll ignore the carbon footprint of that smoke & money fire), it is some real smoke and some real fire shot from an impressive camera angle that makes the pants look taller than they are.  They’re standing in the corner, looking tall and legless, but they’re still pants, and they still need to be estimated at a reasonable value that reflects the worth of the company – much like pants that really, really should have been washed so that I never, ever had to hear stories of my dad’s friend’s pants that probably smelled foul.

Ewwwwww.

Cholestrol, Fat and the Economy

October 10th, 2008 by Randy Peterman No comments »

Did you know that your body needs Cholestrol and fat? I bet that all of the negative ‘news’ you hear doesn’t lead you to believe that you do, but you do.  In fact some fats will keep your brain healthy, and some cholestrol actually helps your heart.  Crazy, huh? [disclosure: this is not medical advice - seek a doctor and all that jazz].  Here’s the kicker: some debt in the economy, as a tool to help companies get started seems to be OK.  Some debt for consumers seems to be helpful at times when major things need some attention.  I don’t recommend debt, but small levels in specific locations are safer than others.  The safe types of fat and cholestrol in appropriate quantities keep your body moving and grooving.

Here’s the deal: too much of the debt doesn’t keep things moving, it makes things stop up and causes strokes just like regular human body blockage.  Adding more debt to the economy’s ‘breathing room’ by ‘unfreezing’ the credit opportunities is just like putting a stint into an artery but them immediately going out to guzzle down the largest fast food meal you can find.

Trent of the Simple Dollar posted on twitter that he had a person asking how they should tell their children that they’re losing their home.  More credit doesn’t help this situation.  If I lose my home due to foreclosure having access to more credit doesn’t fix the problem that I’m in over my head.  The ability to infinitely borrow doesn’t help anyone.  The ability to aggressively pay back the debt and get to a positive cash flow matters a lot.

If I cheat and have a nasty, super-duper grody dripping rack of ribs all by myself but then go run a mile and then eat another sloppy rack of ribs (which is wrong, because ribs do not have to be prepared like that) I’ve not fixed the problem either.  If I got into debt, pay back most of it and then buy a bigger TV on it, but am not saving for retirement I’ve blown it.  If I go into retirement with money saved, but still have stupid amounts of debt, I’ve blown it.  Debt, much like a medical condition that needs attention, can’t be put off indefinitely.

So, watch your diet, watch your spending, take care of any debt or health issues, and don’t be fooled into thinking that we can quickly fix the economic situation with more debt.  More debt doesn’t help like more cholestrol doesn’t help.  Which is why I’m going to stop typing and go eat a carrot.  The Vitamin A will help my eyes so that I can read more of the stuff coming in over the wire on this screen;)