Posts Tagged ‘money’

How To Rake it in With Google Adsense

December 10th, 2008

If you’re like me you dream of being an Internet millionaire just scraping by.  You wish that you could make more cash from Google Adsense than California has managed to get into debt by.  In case you hadn’t heard, that’s a lot of money [currently just shy of 52 billion dollars].  The best way to make mone like I do with Google adsense is to game the system with hot keywords, but I don’t know how to do that and I’m not interested in gaming the system.  Instead I make slow money as over time total strangers click through on the ads on this site when what they’re looking for (usually adult content, because this site is full of that content) is advertised in a Google ad.

I have, over time, received a very large Google check of $100.00 from Google every couple of what I have come to call “Google years”.  I run no less than 5 sites that have Google ads, but none of them actually generate what I would call revenue.  They’re blogs.  They have content that doesn’t get read often (other than a few pages that are linked to from within Wikipedia, surprisingly).  A Google Year is the amount of time it takes me to get the minimum amount of adsense clicky-clicky revenue.  The speed of light is measured in light years, the speed of money is measured in Google years.  The best way to compare the two is like this: Light years are like the fastest expensive sports car money can by and Google years (for me at least) are like a two wheeled Yugo being drawn by a three legged mule that is blind, missing a quarter of his right ear, and named Edna.  Edna is a boy horse who has been named incorrectly by a very abusive Yugo and mule owner.  Edna cannot compete with the expensive sports car in performance, but Edna moves, steadily forward.

If you want to maximize Google revenue you’ll want to put the advertisements all over your page, but I’m not interested in maximizing revenue, I’m interested in maximizing content.  You will find that I make decisions based on the capitalistic concept of ‘lazy faire’ which means, “let the people click on ads if they want to,” in English.  Lazy fair is Franglish, its English and French in origin and I think I just made it up.  Just like the money in the banks that Google dispenses every Google Year.

Another technique to becoming wealthy through Google is to be good at mathematics.  I understand that they only hire the best engineers, and then give them stock options.  I try to stay away from stock options because the stocks are right next to the gallows and I’d prefer not to get lynched.  Either way, being good at math will not hurt, especially if you have to use it in calculating the change from selling hamburgers at your third job because the Internet Millionaire thing isn’t working out.

Why We Should (NOT) Tax the Wealthy More

October 27th, 2008

What if your company where you worked were bought out by another company and in that acquisition you were offered $100,000.00 as a bonus for the acquisition?  Would you take it?  In the state of Colorado where I live taxes on that money, including federal taxes on that money would put you at having 40% taken in taxes (without itemized deductions and what not).  That would be like actually getting 60,000.00.  Would you still take it?  Oops, I forgot something.  The Federal Government actually takes a bonus 20% on top of that for them because the money is a lump sum.  That would leave you with $40,000.00 out of an original $100,000.00.  Would you still take it?

Sure, you’d still want the money, but I think that the recent hullabaloo that I’ve heard recently about taxing the wealthy (AKA ‘rich’) to distribute the wealth is not as forthright as it sounds.  There are two (or more) areas that concern me about this.  The first is that recent numbers show that just under 40% of the entire nation’s federal income tax is generated by the top 1% of America’s earners.  That’s right, the ration is that askew [see: http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/23440.html].   The second is that in my own household if I am strapped for cash: I have to either go into deeper debt (which I’m digging out of) or I have to cut spending.  I can only go so far deep into debt, so we cut spending.  If the Federal government wants to get their budget together, they too, should have to cut spending and not raise billions or trillions of dollars in debt.

Here’s the kicker: if you add on sales tax which there is the potential of the $40,000.00 being spent ‘in state’ you could see up to 10% MORE tax being taken at the register depending where you go shopping.  That means that out of the original $100,000.00 the person who was rewarded by their company has now had 70% taken in the form of taxes.  That would make me want to throw another tea party.

I know that as a country we’re all trying to see equitable charity, the furtherance of our families and the general well being of the population, but if we can’t afford wellfare programs because we don’t have enough money, if we can’t afford to pay for a massive military (which is a hot topic and I won’t attempt to address it in this post), if we can’t afford to watch our airports with a crack squad of TSA agents (who fail to find my pocket knife every time I forget I have it with me) then we need to cut things.  This hurts.  This could impact jobs, this could impact the entire nation.

Here’s an opportunity for Americans to be innovative again.  This nation had a time of prosperity that was unbelievable.  We had brilliant thinkers making brilliant products brilliantly.  But we’ve passed that and now we’re all hoping to be lucky enough to make it with the next e-business, dot com super-story, or sue someone else for their money.  But what if brilliant people worked together to make new brilliant products that we then sold to the rest of the world just like the ‘good old days’ only it was now?

Well, if that were to happen we’d tax the snot out of those brilliant people and punish them for their productivity.  I think I’d prefer to just shuffle along and make moderate wages and not be taxed up to 70%.  This isn’t Bill Gates’ problem.  This isn’t Warren Buffet’s problem.  This is your problem.  It’s my problem.  It’s our problem.  Lets vote next month (not too many days away, now) with a conscience.  Lets send a message to our representatives that we’re not going to take it any more.  We, as a people, have a right to the fruits of our labor and at present we’re not looking out for one another, and it makes me sad.  The good news is that there are ways out of where we’re at.  It will take determination, and it might hurt a bit, but if we can make a united effort, we might just be the United People of the United States.

Hard Pressed with Extra Starch

October 14th, 2008

I grew up hearing stories of my dad’s college days.  One such story included an acquaintance that owned a pair of pants that he did not wash until they were told to have disentigrated.  The pants at one point in time could stand up in a corner on their own from all of the materials that had been collected in the fibers of the fabric.  My personal hygiene alarm goes off every time that story comes to mind.  My skin crawls with the imaginary microbes, bacteria and germs that those pants must have harbored.  The pants were not standing up because they were filled with something, namely legs, but instead they were standing up because of external influences.

I had a realization this week as I was pondering the significance of the numbers of trillions of dollars that have been lost globally in various financial markets.  The realization was not one that I should have had to wait until 31 to have and I wanted to pass it along in case others had not been exposed to it: The stocks in the market may very well need a good washing because there are not always legs holding up their pants.  Each stock is not worth the value that is given to it on the market that day, it is worth the value the people (thankfully not germs) put on it and built into the fibers of the stock the minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, or years before.  But unless the companies behind the stocks are actually doing amazingly good things and you’re owning a piece of a real company that is worthy of ownership, you could be buying extra crunchy pants.

You could be hard pressed to find a company that is worth the esteemed value of the stock, but it is important to remember that not each person who owns a $132/share stock paid $132 per share.  They might have paid $32.00/share and others after them paid more than that.  Obviously that’s why the investor makes money if they buy at $32.00 and sell at $132.00, but when the market tumbles and share values drop its not a loss of actual wealth, its the loss of unrealized wealth.  There’s a BIG difference.  Its not that the estimated value doesn’t matter, but instead it is important to have the principles of the theory behind the market in mind as you’re looking at the numbers.  If I buy a stock at $32.00 and sell it at $30.00 I very literally lose $2.00 per share (plus any trading fees to buy the stock and to sell the stock).  What you need to realize is that as an investor I may have also missed the unrealized reward of the stock jumping to $64.00 per share and in an attempt to ‘hold out for more’ the stock reversed and dropped me down to where I realized the stock was going to go down to less than I paid for it and by the time I could find a buyer, it had devalued to less than my original buying price.  Realized and unrealized wealth are two different things and when the media or overly dramatic persons speak about trillions of dollars in wealth disappearing, it isn’t all like real dollars going up into real smoke (we’ll ignore the carbon footprint of that smoke & money fire), it is some real smoke and some real fire shot from an impressive camera angle that makes the pants look taller than they are.  They’re standing in the corner, looking tall and legless, but they’re still pants, and they still need to be estimated at a reasonable value that reflects the worth of the company – much like pants that really, really should have been washed so that I never, ever had to hear stories of my dad’s friend’s pants that probably smelled foul.

Ewwwwww.

Go Read This: Link Splash

March 20th, 2008

I’ve recently had my eyes caught by a few articles that I thought I’d pass along.  Please consider reading the following articles because they’re either informative, well written, or both.

Fivers - check out the details on the new five dollar bills.  If you don’t, someone else will!

Extravagant Spending -  Is extravagant spending even remotely insane?  If you’ve ever watched a show like Pimp My Ride, Cribs, or any of the many copy-cat shows that are out there to show off (estimated) wealth, then you’ve wrestled with some of the neat toys and known you couldn’t afford it and feel right about the expenditures.

Watch Your Laundry Maker -  A handy article about doing laundry the right way: measure twice, wash once.

Fully Funding Accounts – How much does it cost to fully fund various savings accounts and retirement accounts?

The Home Shopping Brainwash Network – A great analysis of the Home Shopping Network and how they market to their watchers.  This stuff scares the snot out of me because I know there are people at home just sitting there waiting to spend money they have, don’t have, or should keep.

What is a Million Dollars Really Worth?

March 19th, 2008

I had someone hit this site looking for, “Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?”  I can’t believe that people would consider this, but then again, its people we’re talking about: the anonymous mass of Internet users who don’t have to be identified and so asking such a question doesn’t come with the stigma that asking it of your friends and classmates might.  The question that begs is this: What is a million dollars worth?

In our modern relativistic culture there is little value placed on sexuality within marriage, and the sanctity of marriage (sanctity being the setting aside as special) .  Sex is not worth a million dollars, that cheapens it, it is invaluable.  A million dollars is a lot of money, but it isn’t enough money to offset emotional scars, the fact that you’d be engaging in prostitution (see: Eliot Spitzer).

Various people have posed nude in magazines for money, taken jobs that they didn’t agree with because of a high paying salary, and of course there’s the age old televangelist schtick as well.  Money is not important if it is gained in an ill gotten fashion.  Having standards, focusing on the long term impact (how many women did something pornographic and then had children and were mortified that their children would find out?  What about parents finding out?).

A million dollars won’t buy you happiness, love, or a long term financial state (it is just as easily lost on frivolous activities and spending).  What’s a million dollars worth to you?  Is it worth your dignity?

Credit Rate Reduction: What Does it Mean to My Wallet?

March 19th, 2008

If you’re a newer reader you may not be familiar with the Credit Rate Reduction Rally.  One of the purposes behind the rally was to build a movement that is about optimizing interest rates for people paying off debt.  In my case doing this on one of our cards reduced the interest we’re paying per month (which also includes a lower balance from making payments) by $125.00 a month.  That would be like saving roughly $1,400.00 in one year’s time [calculated loosely with the assumption of a reducing balance with minimum payments].  Or three Nintendo Wii’s, several car payments, a very, very nice bottle of wine, a Mac Book with memory upgrade, or a nice donation to a charity.

Have you sat down and calculated how much money you might save by getting your interest rates reduced?  Be persistent, be consistent, and make them change your interest rate.  It could change your future!

Other People’s Emergency Funds

March 17th, 2008

My wife and I were both approached by people in need in the same week. People who appeared to be genuinely in need instead of folks simply pan-handling to be lazy (which is a bit of a generalization, and I apologize). One of the things that we wrestle with this is that we want to be generous, we want to look for opportunities to help others, and we really like the idea of serving people as Christians. However, we’re paying off debt because as a moron (instead of a Christian) I allowed the family finances to get way out of whack. That being said, we’re considering pulling $40.00 aside from somewhere to setup someone else’s emergency fund. That is $20.00 for each of us to help others in an emergency.

We don’t anticipate tapping into it regularly, but the opportunity to serve is great, and sometimes we may have the ability to use our finances when others are in a teachable moment. Of course, in those same moments we need to remain teachable, but we’re glad to have learned to live on less than we make. What do you think? Would you create an OPEF category in your budget?

I’m reminded of Bob at ChristianPF and his story of compassion.  God uses us, others needs are met, and we can learn something.  That’s worth more than $20.00 to me.

2007 Taxes: Finished

March 15th, 2008

Taxes: Creative Commons License: http://flickr.com/photos/honan/453195084/I finished doing our 2007 taxes today. Papers are printed out, two checks need to be written, and on Monday we’ll mail the taxes and checks out to the federal government and the state of Colorado. I was hoping that our checks would be smaller together, but I am proud to say that our federal check is only $100.00. Given that I have had to send thousands in past years, this means that we’ve managed to calculate, pay and balance our tax cycle. Our state check was higher, but next year I think we’ll have it nailed pat. Furthermore, since we are sending in less in taxes we’ll have more money to put down on our debt reduction snowball!

I don’t love taxes, but I sure do love having gotten the numbers closer this year. As weird as it sounds I can’t wait to find out about next year’s taxes because I’m ready to be even closer (or possibly get a very, very small refund check because we maximized deductions and credits). I believe there are a few more things that are certain besides death & taxes, but I’m glad to have 2007 behind me.

Bonus: The number one thing that ended up saving me more than I expected (for some ignorant reason) was donations.  We donated stuff to Goodwill as well as supporting various missionaries, our church, and World Vision.  If you’re looking for ways to make your 2008 count, this may be a good way to do so.

Going to the Doctor Costs Me Dinner Every Time…

March 4th, 2008

Creative Commons Doctor http://flickr.com/photos/dde/351801970/sizes/o/Every time I go to an evening doctors appointment I end up springing for dinner for my family. Usually around $30.00 or so (we’ll pick a place like Jason’s Deli which is potentially more nutritious than a fast food restaurant, but not much more expensive). The evening appointments cost the same as the day appointments at the doctor’s office, but I can avoid missing a lot of work time during the day. The nicety of going in the evening is offset by the eating out, but when you’re sitting there at the restaurant having spent more money than you’d like for the evening you have to account for your choices.

I think I may try taking an afternoon appointment in the future and make up missed work time in the evening because it’ll still cost me less than appointments and dinner. Its time to do investigative surgery and at least try the other approach and see if it saves the money it should save. Hopefully a lesson learned and we’ll just move forward from here.

Propaganda: Going Up $385.00 a Year For 20 Years

February 11th, 2008

The home owners association in my neighborhood is trying to improve the appearance of the neighborhood I live in by getting taxes levied so that the city can build a nice brick fence around the neighborhood and make it look much, much nicer.  I’m actually all for it.  It’ll cost $385.00 more a year in taxes, but that’s a mostly good thing.  You see my neighborhood is older, its almost forty years old and it needs some gentrification pretty badly.  There’s very little about its older state that would draw people in other than low cost housing.  That is, in fact, what drew us into the neighborhood.  The Denver metroplex is very expensive and I haven’t got the money to live in the high-priced parts of Denver proper.  This house works just fine for me and my family.

The community is pretty split on this fence issue because the rise in taxes means some older folks on fixed incomes would suddenly find their homes going up in value (potentially) and their taxes going up.  The folks who want their properties to go up or maintain value want the fence, and those who want to keep their taxes low just want to leave things ‘as is’. One problem is that there has been a propaganda war going on and I got a flier this last weekend stating that “Property taxes will go up an average of $385 per year for 20 years.”  This is blatantly false.  The accurate statement would be that your property taxes will go up by $385.00 until the fence is paid off in 20 years.

Propaganda is nasty, its is like marketing from the devil :)   If you find yourself with an issue that impacts your finances and involves a community like this make sure that you fairly represent the scenario, it will be good for you, it will be good for the community, and it will allow you to be honest no matter which side you’re on.